Saturday, 7 January 2012

Paper at the Conference: Theological Explorations of Christian Mysticism Christian Oxford, January 2012

Our modern understanding of science and culture builds on two key concepts: a representationalist concept of space that presupposes the unification of arithmetic and geometry; and the concept of subjective autonomy. The theoretical formulation of these concepts can be traced back to Descartes’ Discours de la méthode, which was published together with his Dioptrics and Geometry in 1637. However, as I will demonstrate in a forthcoming book, both concepts had already rapidly emerged 200 years earlier after architect Filippo Brunelleschi’s public ‘demonstrations’ of the linear perspective in Florence in 1425. The modern concepts of science and culture were not invented by scientists, but were rather the outcome of an artistic vision of space. This explains why the accompanying vision of scientific realism was successful despite its anti-realist presuppositions and mathematical flaws.
In 1435 Leon Battista Alberti provided in his book De pictura  what is assumed to be the first theoretical account of the principles that stood behind Brunelleschi’s experiments. This account built on Biagio Pelacani da Parma’s mathematization of the visual space with which he became acquainted at the lectures of Biagio’s disciple Prosdocimus de’ Beldomandis during his study time in Padua. Nicholas of Cusa may have met Alberti during these lectures, and he certainly made his acquaintance later at the ‘Florentine Stammtisch’ of his close friend Paolo dal Pozzo Toscanelli where Brunelleschi was also present. In his first philosophical book De docta ignorantia of 1440-42 Cusa developed a more mathematically rigorous account of the mathematization of space that avoids the simplifications of Alberti, and displays amazing similarities to the alternative liturgical vision of space in the north Burgundy paintings of artists such as Jan van Eyck. Eventually, in 1453, Cusa sent a little book to the Monks of the Monastery of Tegernsee entitled On the vision of God, together with a little icon, and the instructions to a social experiment that visualized the principles of this liturgical concept of space. In the following chapters Cusa provided comprehensive deconstruction of Alberti’s concepts of space, perspectivity, and subjective autonomy. My paper will provide a short introduction to this text.
 

Thursday, 28 July 2011

Comments on the forthcoming book publication "The Liturgical Turn"

Nicholas of Cusa has long waited his true time and a true reader. The time has now arrived - the time of a Christian apophatic theology that is able to trump postmodernity. And the reader has now arrived: Johannes Hoff, who at last frees the early Renaissance sage of the Moselle from anachronistic Kantian and idealist misreadings. But the Cusa who emerges does not lag behind Kant and Hegel - he is rather already ahead of them in his radical recognition of our embodied and temporal contingency which is at once, and inextricably, both natural and artificial, both given to us and constructed by us. Ahead of them also in his recognition that our finitude does not mark out the known but the unknown - a situation that can only be salvaged if we link the relative unknownness of the immediate with the absolute unknownness of God and yet discover in this linkage a new possibility of mediation and of a paradoxical, but still analogical access to the divine. The future of serious theology in a Patristic and Thomistic tradition may well be Cusan, and Hoff explains why. We are all massively in the debt of this singularly brilliant young German Catholic theologian.
John Milbank, University of Nottingham


As an old-fashioned Thomist I have just discovered from Johannes Hoff's splendid book how inexcusable my ignorance of Nicholas of Cusa all these years has been: it's never too late to learn!
Fergus Kerr OP, University of Edinburgh / St. Andrews University


As yet relatively unknown amongst Anglophone readers, this book will firmly establish Johannes Hoff as one of the most remarkable theologians of his generation. Hoff demonstrates that Nicholas of Cusa, while building on the analogical imagination of Thomas Aquinas, offers a genuinely radical but deeply traditional view of rationality and language just as the landscape of modernity comes into view. Through exemplary readings of medieval, modern and late modern texts, Hoff presents original, intricate and compelling solutions to the impasses of our contemporary intellectual culture.
Simon Oliver, University of Nottingham


It is often said that there are many analogies between the thought of Nicholas of Cusa and postmodern theories. Nevertheless Cusanus-research had to wait until Johannes Hoff’s remarkable German book Kontingenz, Berührung, Überschreitung. Zur philosophischen Propädeutik christlicher Mystik nach Nikolaus von Kues (Munich 2007) – to find a systematic concept, enabling a serious discussion on the meaning of Cusa for postmodern theology – and as such also for philosophy of religion and the debate concerning modernization processes in general. In my review of 2009 (Bijdragen), I wrote that this book the most important book on Cusa of the last 20 years, and I am still of this opinion. And this is so, for Hoff shows how the study of Cusa opens new perspectives for actual philosophical and theological debates.
Inigo Bocken, University of Nijmegen


Johannes Hoff’s previous publication, a committed and erudite book on Nicholas of Cusa, is without doubt one of the most outstanding new German publications in Systematic Theology. Not only does it include a penetrating interpretation of Cusa, which is remarkable enough, but it is also a major breakthrough in the contemporary Catholic avant-garde, in calling for a broader explanation and stimulating discussion far beyond the boundaries of a specialist discipline. This present volume, ‘The Liturgical Turn’, now published in the context of Anglophone theology, inspires my curiosity about the next steps of the author.
Günter Bader, University of Bonn

Forthcoming book publication

The Liturgical Turn. Looking back to
(Post-)Modernity with Nicholas of Cusa



This book sets out to recover Nicholas of Cusa’s response to the upheavals of early modernity, and in doing so, develops a fresh perspective on the challenges of our time. In contrast to post-Renaissance thinking, Cusa’s appreciation of individual subjectivity and scientific curiosity was deeply rooted in the analogical (narrative) rationality of the Middle Ages. Starting with the post-structuralist debates of the 20th century, the book uncovers in this response the conceptual keys for a recovery of the pre-modern tradition of Christian learning which is relevant for the 21st century.
It could be said that globalised societies are characterized by their inability to reconcile the seemingly black and white univocity of scientific rationality with the ambiguous equivocity of post-modern pop-culture. In the 15th century Cusa revived and transformed the analogical middle way of the Middle Ages in a manner which now, retrospectively, offers new insights both into the ‘completely ordinary chaos’ of post-modern everyday life, and the crisis of a scientific culture which has become blind to its constitutional limitations. Cusa found a way to circumvent the foundationalist rationality of later eras; by avoiding metaphysical or dogmatic pre-judgements about the foundations of human thinking, he developed a mystagogical approach to the infinity of God which is rooted in a context-sensitive, spiritual and liturgical practice. The book will build on this spiritual approach to develop a philosophical theology which mediates between the relativism of post-modern everyday life and the dogmatic attachment to scientific standards of rationality, thus overcoming the defensive and liturgically diluted tradition of classical modern theology.


Annotation
This concise publication is a sequel to my comprehensive German monograph on Nicholas of Cusa, considered to be a fundamental challenge to contemporary German theology and one of the most important publications about Cusa’s philosophical theology of the last 20 years (see Inego Boken). The new book aims to make this research available to a broader English speaking audience, and to relate it more explicitly to my second research focus on post-modernity. In addition, it is designed to build bridges between the continental tradition and a more analogically orientated style of Anglophone theology coming out of the last 20 years. Building on Jacques Derrida’s account of apophatic theology, it focuses on liturgical iteration (the calling upon the Name of God: ‘Jesus’) as the key to a systematic understanding of the Anglophone paradigm-shift. The fusion of this systematic approach found in the Continental tradition of ‘fundamental theology’ with the ‘radical orthodox’ orientation of recent English-speaking developments makes this book a unique contribution to theological scholarly debates of our time.
Parts of the book have been developed out of my postgraduate teaching on ‘Post-modernity and the Return of Apophatic Theology’ (ch. 2), and ‘Revelation’ in my lectures on ‘Philosophy and Theology’ (ch. 3). The first chapter is designed to be a highly accessible historical and philosophical introduction to the mystical theology of Nicholas of Cusa. Hence the book is ideal for postgraduate students, with some chapters having relevance at the undergraduate level. 
In addition to its vital significance with regard to recent scholarly debates, the book will also address the following areas:

  • Postmodernity
  • Theology and Globalisation
  • Radical Orthodoxy
  • Mysticism
  • Nicholas of Cusa
  • Fundamental Theology
  • Revelation
  • Modern Continental Theology (Barth, Rahner, Pannenberg)
  • Jacques Derrida

Book structure
  • Introduction
  • Nicholas of Cusa’s Response to the Challenge of Early Modernity.
  • Looking Back to Postmodernity with Nicholas of Cusa
  • Ressourcement, Apophaticism and the Shortcomings of Modern Theology

Draft structure of the forthcoming German book

Performance-Künstler Gottes.
Glaube, Vernunft, Kultur

Postmoderne Glaubenspraktiken 
  • Sakrales und Profanes in einer post-traditionellen Gesellschaft
  • Das Verschwinden des Körpers angesichts der (post-)modernen Wut des Verstehens in der Liturgie
  • 'I think the church is wonderful'. Michel Foucault als Wegbereiter des Paradigmenwechsels anglophoner Theologie
Glaube, Vernunft, Kultur
  • Glauben und Wissen im Spannungsfeld kultureller Praktiken des Glaubenmachens
  • Die sich selbst zurücknehmende Inszenierung von Reden und  Schweigen in der mystagogischen Rhetorik des Nikolaus von Kues
  • Bürger, Künstler, Exorzisten: Wissenschaft, Kunst und Kult in den Spuren Hugo Balls
Die Wiederentdeckung der Jetzt-Zeit
  • Leben in Fülle: Christoph Schlingensiefs Katholizismus und die Dekonstruktion (post-)moderner Kunstreligion
  • Performance-Künstler Gottes: Ein Versuch über Augustinus und  Christoph Schlingensief

Monday, 25 July 2011

Research Activities

I am currently preparing a book publication in the Series 'Interventions' (Eerdmans) under the title The Liturgical Turn. Looking back to (Post-) Modernity with Nicholas of Cusa (2013) and a publication with the German publisher Kohlhammer under the title Performance-Künstler Gottes. Glaube, Vernunft, Kultur (2012). I am furthermore preparing (together with Dr. Casiday) a translation of Hugo Ball’s book Das Byzantinische Christentum (1927).

Cultural activities

I was collaborating with the German film and theatre director, artist and actor Christoph Schlingensief till he died in August 2010 (see also Schlingensief's comments on our collaboration and friendship in the German cultural journal Cicero, and the related TV interview in DIE ZEIT). This included my collaboration in his production Sterben lernen at the Theater Neumarkt in Zürich, which was partly based on my research on Meister Eckhart and Nicholas of Cusa (see particularly the video recording of 'Sterben Lernen (Akt 4)' at the bottom of Schlingenblog 5), and my contribution on The Performance Artist Saint Augustine to the so called 'Schlingensief-Feuilleton' which he designed in preparation of his much discussed Opera Village in Africa for the Christmas edition of the German weekly newspaper DIE ZEIT in 2009. Subsequent to this collaboration, I was involved in the preparation of the German Pavilion on Christoph Schlingenseif at the Venice Biennale 2011, which has been awarded with the Golden Lion for the 'top international contribution' (see also ZDF / ARD, National Catholic Register, and Youtube). The accompanying book publication is also available in English translation.
Most recently I participated as critical advisor in the preparations for the Tannhäuser staging at the Bayreuth Festival in 2011 in connection with the Wagner-Concil at the Akademie der Künste in Berlin, which was followed in August by the symposium 'Tannhäuser – Werkstatt der Gefühle Wagner-Concil 2011' in Bayreuth. In 2012 I published in the 13th edition of the German Cultural Journal ‘Kultur & Gespenster’ an essay on ‘Science, Culture and Art in the traces of Hugo Ball’ under the title ‘Bürger, Künstler, Exorzisten’ (Burgesses, Artists, Exorcists). Hugo Ball was one of the heads of the Dadaist movement, and hence one of the path-breakers of the Avant-Garde movements of the 20th century. After founding this movement he became a Catholic.  I am currently preparing, together with my Lampeter colleague Dr. Casiday, a translation of Hugo Ball’s book 'Das Byzantinische Christentum' (1927). This translation is a collaborative project with the Cabaret Voltaire (i.e. the former founding centre of the Dada movement) and the Slovenian Artist group IRWIN/KS, and was launched by the Zürich exhibition "What is art: Hugo Ball" in 2010.